Weak or manual product recommendations

Recommendations in the email should match the ones on the page

One engine serves both in Maestra Platform, the all-in-one retention marketing platform for ecommerce brands, built out by a forward-deployed marketer.

The Maestra platform interface

+15%

growth in website conversion rate

Brands running on Maestra

Customer logoCustomer logoCustomer logoCustomer logoCustomer logoCustomer logo

The problem

When recommendations actively work against your average order value

Some recommendation setups surface whatever is cheapest or easiest to match, quietly dragging down AOV instead of lifting it. Others require so much manual customization that teams end up doing the engine's job for it, defeating the point of automation.

What we hear from brands

an ecommerce brand with a companion mobile app sees product recommendations surfacing very low-priced items, dragging down AOV

an industrial-supplies company wants recommendations based on industry affinities and cart context, but existing solutions require heavy customization

a home goods and drinkware brand says current upsells require significant manual editing and don't effectively cross-sell between categories

The new way

AI on autopilot, with business rules whenever you want the wheel

Recommendations can run entirely on Maestra's AI engine, picking products from your inventory automatically. Or your team can fine-tune by color, price, category, or collection with no-code business rules, so merchandising expertise and machine learning work side by side instead of competing.

Outcomes brands report

+8.7%

growth in AOV

From a published case study

+14%

in conversion rate

From a published case study

Customer proof

An upsell bar that suggests the thing they forgot

4.8 rating on G2
G2 High Performer, Personalization

Sleeping bags need liners and stuff sacks, and shoppers rarely remember both. A smart upsell bar raised the average order value by more than a third with no discount involved.

An upsell bar that suggests the thing they forgot (Maestra case study)Read the full case study

+38.7%

growth in average order value from the upsell bar

How it works

No IT project on your side

01

Nothing to install

Your developers are not part of this. Setup and day-to-day operation need no engineering support.

02

Your marketer does the building

Segments, flows, personalization rules, and A/B tests are their work, not a backlog item for someone on your team.

03

You review, they ship

Keeping up with approvals is the biggest job left on your side once the plan is agreed.

The platform

One engine behind every channel

Email, SMS, push, messengers, and the website are outputs of the same rules and the same data. Adding a channel is a setting rather than another vendor and another integration to maintain.

Email, SMS and MMSMobile pushMessengers and chatbotsSite personalizationOmnichannel journey builder
The Maestra platform interface

Your forward-deployed marketer

The first month, concretely

A roadmap you approve, the data migrated, deliverability configured, and the first flows live. None of that arrives as a recommendation for your team to implement.

Roadmap agreed in week one

Migration and deliverability handled for you

First flows live inside the first month

Replace your stack

What a fragmented stack costs beyond the invoices

Split data means every question takes an export, and every campaign is built from a partial view. The subscriptions are the visible cost, the missing single profile is the expensive one.

ReplacesKlaviyoAttentiveYotpoNostoBloomreach

See it running before you talk to anyone

There is a tour of the platform on the site, and it does not ask for a calendar invite first.